Markets · Bank loans and deposits
Bank loans and deposits, Q2 2026 positions: $22.3tn of cross-border holdings identified by pair; the largest is UK → United States ($2,043bn)
Cite
Cite this view
datasteg (2026), “Market matrix: bank loans and deposits”, datasteg money-flow, release 20261102.2, method 1.5, 2 November 2026, https://money-flow.datasteg.com/en/m/bank?r=20261102.2&d=2026-11-02.
Figure note: Source: datasteg money-flow (release 20261102.2, method 1.5), from BIS LBS.
BibTeX
@misc{datasteg:mf:mkt-bank:20261102.2,
author = {{datasteg}},
title = {Market matrix: bank loans and deposits},
howpublished = {datasteg money-flow, release 20261102.2, method 1.5},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-11-02},
url = {https://money-flow.datasteg.com/en/m/bank?r=20261102.2&d=2026-11-02},
urldate = {2026-11-02},
note = {Positions from BIS LBS}
}The datasets' own citations (1)
- Bank for International Settlements (2026), Locational banking statistics, retrieved 30 October 2026, https://data.bis.org/topics/LBS.
The method's citation
datasteg (2026), “Money-flow methodology”, version 1.5, datasteg money-flow, 2 November 2026, https://money-flow.datasteg.com/en/method?v=1.5.
@misc{datasteg:mf:method:1.5,
author = {{datasteg}},
title = {Money-flow methodology},
howpublished = {datasteg money-flow, version 1.5},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-11-02},
url = {https://money-flow.datasteg.com/en/method?v=1.5},
urldate = {2026-11-02}
}For each instrument, who holds whose assets · data: Q2 2026 positions · release 20261102.2 · method 1.5 · Updated 2 Nov 2026, 22:57 KST
Holders / destinations
29 / 214
Q2 2026 position · economies with pair data
Largest holder: UK
$5.7 tn
Q2 2026 position · net +$2.8tn
Largest destination: United States
$4.1 tn
Q2 2026 position · 9% held via FC/FD
How to read this
- Direction. Rows hold, columns issued. One cell reads: “Banks located in row hold the value of loan and deposit claims on column residents”.
- A stock, not a flow. Values are Q2 2026 positions, not what was invested that year; they grow with prices even without transactions.
- Residence basis. A holder is where the position is booked. A holder in an FC or FD economy is often not the final investor.
- FC · FD. FC is an offshore financial centre: An offshore centre in the BIS grouping: shell companies, special purpose vehicles, hedge funds and holding companies of foreign firms (e.g. Chinese firms incorporated in the Cayman Islands). A holder here is usually a pass-through, not the final investor. FD is a fund domicile: Where investment funds are legally domiciled (Luxembourg, Ireland, the Netherlands, Switzerland). Holdings booked here are mostly the assets of funds that investors elsewhere bought.
- Gross totals double count. The same money can appear twice: UK investors hold $204bn in Luxembourg (UK row × Luxembourg column), and Luxembourg holds $172bn in Germany (Luxembourg row × Germany column). Money can also return home through a pass-through, as in France ⇄ Ireland (round-tripping).
- Big markets are big on both sides. This is gross data, so large markets are large as holders and as destinations; switch to Net to see the difference.
How this differs from the Ladder: the panel tab Ladder vs Markets. For holdings restated by nationality (the final investor): Coppola, Maggiori, Neiman and Schreger (2021).
Bank loans and deposits, Q2 2026 positions · cells: $bn
| Holder ↓ · issuer → | Total · share outside the table (Other) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,043 | 213 | 453 | 350 | 356 | 297 | 156 | 204 | 109 | 120 | $5.7tn · Other 23.8% | |||
1,240 | 1,103 | 160 | 151 | 340 | 452 | 127 | 65 | 77 | 31 | $4.6tn · Other 17.6% | |||
483 | 441 | 179 | 290 | 255 | 57 | 176 | 153 | 52 | 329 | 102 | $3.3tn · Other 23.1% | ||
92 | 115 | 58 | 112 | 119 | $1.2tn · Other 51.1% | ||||||||
761 | 151 | 72 | 61 | $1.1tn · Other 2.9% | |||||||||
126 | 161 | 152 | 81 | 61 | 58 | 56 | $1.0tn · Other 22.8% | ||||||
114 | 112 | 115 | 70 | 68 | 97 | $0.8tn · Other 21.2% | |||||||
36 | 159 | 172 | 34 | $0.7tn · Other 27.1% | |||||||||
41 | 87 | 158 | 72 | 34 | $0.5tn · Other 15.2% | ||||||||
85 | 80 | 34 | $0.5tn · Other 33.1% | ||||||||||
61 | 82 | 33 | 47 | $0.4tn · Other 23.5% | |||||||||
38 | 40 | 93 | 57 | 35 | $0.4tn · Other 26.1% | ||||||||
| Column total (hatched = holders outside the table) | 7.0% | 12.6% | 2.5% | 4.9% | 7.4% | 6.0% | 1.8% | 5.0% | 8.2% | 17.5% | 2.0% | 4.4% | Identified total $22.3tn |
Source: BIS LBS (Q2 2026). Calculations: datasteg money-flow, method 1.5, rules R1, R2, R5, R11.
Cut a lender: who loses, against net reserves
A what-if on this matrix (rule R21). Pick a lender and every debtor it lends to takes the cut, or pick a debtor and each of its lenders cuts. Loss = cut × the lender’s share × the debtor’s bank claims from all BIS reporters, shown against the debtor’s net reserves (the Signal Board’s A2 denominator). A scaling of reported positions, not a forecast: banks also roll over, hedge and replace.
If each lender cut its claims on Korea by 30%, the largest loss would come from banks in Hong Kong: $11bn, 2.6% of Korea’s net reserves ($434bn).
- Hong Kong$11bn23.3%
- UK$5bn10.3%
- United States$5bn10.0%
- France$2bn4.7%
- Taiwan$1bn2.8%
- Macao$1bn2.6%
- Australia$0bn0.8%
- Luxembourg$0bn0.5%
- Spain$0bn0.4%
- Netherlands$0bn0.3%
- Belgium$0bn0.1%
- Canada$0bn0.1%
- Italy$0bn0.1%
- Philippines$0bn0.1%
- Sweden$0bn0.1%
Source: BIS LBS; net reserves from the Signal Board (IMF IRFCL) · Positions Q2 2026 · Rule R21